• About DWP&M
  • Our Founders
  • Our Practice
    - Public Service
    - Litigation
    - Corporate
    - Municipal
    - Intellectual Property
    - Trusts & Estates
    - Real Estate
    - Environmental
    - Employment

  • Members of the Firm
  • Your Resources
    - Quarterly Newsletter
    - Appellate Tax Report
    - Litigation Newsletter
    - Firm News and Information
  • Request Info
  • Employment Opps.
  • Contact Us




  • Point of View
    Quarterly Newsletter

    2001 Estate Tax Changes

    By Paul S. Doherty

    This article will explain how estate planning may be affected by the 2001 Tax Act. The new law gradually eliminates the estate tax by increasing the amount that is exempt from the tax over several years, reducing the top rate over several years, and finally repealing the estate tax for individuals dying after 2009. There is a quirk in the law. To comply with budgetary rules, the 2001 Act contains a so-called sunset rule under which the pre-2001 Act rules return after 2010 unless Congress provides otherwise at some future time. This means that the estate tax is repealed only for those who die in 2010.

    Background. Currently, there is no gift tax and no estate tax on the first $675,000 of combined transfers during life or at death for gifts made and individuals dying in 2001. The estate and gift taxes are tied together under a unified system having a top rate of 55%. However, there are differences between the gift tax and the estate tax. One difference potentially affects the income tax of donees (recipients) of gifts and heirs of estates. A donee generally gets the donor's basis (usually cost) for a gift. As a result, if there is a gift of appreciated stock, for example, the donee will have a taxable gain if he sells at the appreciated value. Property acquired from a decedent, however, generally gets a basis equal to its value at his death. This means that, on a later sale by the heir, he will not have to pay capital gains tax on the appreciation in the property that occurred while it was held by the decedent.

    Exemption increases and rate reductions. The new law substantially increases the $675,000 exemption after 2001 as follows:

    2002 - 2003$1 million
    2004 - 2005$1.5 million
    2006 - 2008$2 million
    2009 -$3.5 million

    There is also a change in the unified system. The gift tax exemption amount remains at $1 million for ail years after 2001, and the gift tax is not being repealed during 2010 as the estate tax is. Only the estate tax exemption amount will rise to more than $1 million. Under the sunset rule, the exemption will revert to $1 million for estate tax purposes in 2011.

    My expectation is that Congress will revisit the estate tax during the current decade, perhaps permanently increasing the exemption to several million dollars and retaining the estate tax for the larger estates.

    The top estate tax and gift tax rate drops to 50% in 2002, 49% in 2003, 48% in 2004, 47% in 2005, 46% in 2006, and 45% in 2007 through 2009. In 2010, there will be no estate tax and the top gift tax rate will be 35%. The top estate and gift tax rate reverts to 55% in 2011.

    Change to basis rules. When the estate tax is repealed in 2010, the basis rules will be changed to be similar to the gift tax rules but with many opportunities for heirs to get increases in basis. For example, it will be possible to increase the basis of assets received from an individual dying in 2010 by $1.3 million and by an additional $3 million for assets going to a spouse. Under the sunset rule, the step-up in basis rules return for 2011.

    Other changes. The 2001 Act contains a number of other changes, some of which are retroactive. On the positive side, it simplifies, reduces, and, in 2010, repeals the generation-skipping transfer tax, which is a special tax that is designed to prevent individuals from avoiding the estate tax by transferring assets to a generation below the next one (e.g., grandparent transferring to grandchild rather than to child). It also improves the exemption for conservation easements and the provision that allows deferral of estate tax on a closely held business. It even creates a retroactive refund opportunity for some estates that had farms that were valued based on actual use rather than highest and best use. On the negative side, it eliminates the family-owned business deduction for individuals dying after 2003.

    Uncertain impact on Planning. The uncertainty of whether the sunset provision will ever come into play and whether an individual will die during a period of increasing exemption amounts makes planning difficult. Also, the way the law works, when income tax costs are factored in, some heirs will face higher tax costs if their benefactor dies in 2010 when the estate tax is repealed than they would if he died before 2010. My expectation is that Congress will revisit the estate tax during the current decade. perhaps permanently increasing the exemption to several million dollars and retaining the estate tax for the larger estates.

    What to do now. Individuals should continue to write wills and develop estate plans to ensure that their assets will pass as they desire and that special needs of particular heirs will be properly addressed. This is so even if there isa good chance of survival until a year when estate tax will not be owed because of the increasing exemption or repeal. Individuals who may have an estate larger than the increasing exemption amount (or the $1 million amount that will apply for 2011 after estate tax is restored one year after it is repealed) should consider making annual exclusion gifts each year. The gift tax annual exclusion allows you to give $10,000 ($20,000 with consent of spouse) to an unlimited number of donees each year without paying gift tax. By doing this, you remove the gift amounts from your estate and save estate tax. In addition, you remove the post-transfer growth in the gifts from your estate. Other steps to reduce estate tax include setting up an irrevocable life insurance trust, establishing a charitable remainder trust, and forming a family limited partnership.

    Special factors for married couples. Married couples should take advantage of the increasing exemption to the extent possible. Also, wills should establish a so-called bypass or credit-shelter trust. Such a trust is funded with an amount equal to the exemption. The survivor gets income from the trust and the assets in the trust pass to the children free of estate tax on the survivor's death. Assets above the exempt amount can be given outright to the surviving spouse or placed in a marital trust for the surviving spouse. This approach may have to be altered depending on the year involved and the size of the estates.

    Record retention. With the scheduled changes to a modified carryover basis system in 2010, it is essential to retain all records of cost or other basis. For a purchased item, this means a receipt or statement showing the amount paid for it. For an item inherited before 20lO, basis ordinarily is the date of death value of the item. For property acquired by gift, the donee's basis usually is the same as the donor's. For depreciable property, basis is reduced to reflect allowable depreciation.

    New look at plan. While the 2001 Act may well save estate taxes to the benefit of beneficiaries, it has added new planning considerations. For many estate plans it would be wise to review them.

    Paul S. Doherty is a partner with the law firm of Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury and Murphy, P. C. in Springfield and a member of the Executive Committee of the Federal Tax Institute of New England.This material may be considered advertising under the rules of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts.




    DOHERTY, WALLACE, PILLSBURY & MURPHY
    ONE MONARCH PLACE, SUITE 1900
    1414 MAIN STREET
    SPRINGFIELD, MA 01144-1900
    TELEPHONE | 413-733-3111
    FAX | 413-734-3910

    Advertising